Інноваційне підприємництво в умовах обмежень і кризи

ІННОВАЦІЙНЕ ПІДПРИЄМНИЦТВО В УМОВАХ ОБМЕЖЕНЬ І КРИЗИ

INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN CONDITIONS OF LIMITATIONS AND CRISIS

Сторінки: 185-189. Номер: №5, Том 1, 2021 (298)

Автори:
ГОНТАРЕВА І. В.
ORCID: 0000-0002-2242-378X
e-mail: ivgontareva@gmail.com
Харківський національний університет імені В.Н. Каразіна

IRYNA GONTAREVA
V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2021-298-5(1)-31
Надійшла / Paper received : 03.08.2021
Надрукована / Paper Printed : 04.10.2021

Анотація мовою оригіналу

     Ціллю даної статті є систематизація і контентний аналіз фінансових і інформаційно-когнітивних обмежень появи і становлення інноваційних малих підприємств в кризисні і посткризисні періоди. Малі інноваційні підприємства в умовах перманентно виникаючих криз стикаються з різними типами обмежень і бар’єрів. Зокрема це зниження об’ємів венчурного капіталу і частки держави в фінансуванні НДДКР, а також трансферу знань в наукомістких високих технологіях. Передбачуване урядом рішення проблеми за допомогою індустріальних парків потребує більш детальнішого технологічного Форсайт-аналізу.
     Ключові слова: інноваційні малі підприємства, кризові явища, бар’єри інноваційного розвитку, індустріальні парки, технологічна грамотність.

Розширена анотація англійською мовою

     The report of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WJPO) for 2020 statistically confirms the connection between the global financial crises and falling spending on research and development. The purpose of this article is to systematize and content analysis of financial and information-cognitive limitations of the emergence and formation of innovative small businesses in crisis and post-crisis periods. The study shows that, first, the investment of the business sector in research and development is more stable than in government agencies. This is due to the fact that during the crisis the state is forced to expand the general support of the population and the most affected part of the business, including small businesses. Second, investment in research and development and innovation are the basis for further economic recovery and growth. Third, before the COVID-19 pandemic, the global economy had not yet fully recovered from the 2008 financial crisis. This affects the innovative activity of small businesses. In the face of ongoing crises, small innovative enterprises face different types of constraints and barriers. In particular, it is the reduction of venture capital and the share of the state in the financing of research and development, as well as the transfer of knowledge on high-tech technologies. The government’s solution to the problem with the help of industrial parks requires a more detailed technological foresight analysis. In developed countries, in addition to the expert opinions of the scientific, business and political communities, the population is encouraged, taking into account their views on technology prospects and the state of the environment. Accordingly, sufficient technological literacy and cognitive ability of the population is assumed. Technological literacy of entrepreneurs who are going to use high-tech and especially breakthrough technologies must be above the amateur level. In the future, it is planned to conduct a content analysis of existing technological foresight forecasts.
     Keywords: innovative small enterprises, crisis phenomena, barriers to innovative development, industrial parks, technological literacy.

References

1. Havrysh O.M., Pylnova V.P., Piskovets O.V. Innovatsiine pidpryiemnytstvo: sutnist, znachennia ta problemy v suchasnykh umovakh funktsionuvannia. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2020. № 12. S. 109–113.
2. Globalnyj innovacionnyj indeks 2020 g. Kto budet finansirovat innovacii. URL : https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII_2020_KeyFindings_RU_web.pdf.
3. Hrudtsyna Yu.V. Innovatsiina diialnist v Ukraini: analiz ta prohnozuvannia. Biznes Ynform. 2019. № 2. S. 78–84.
4. Pysarenko T.V., Kvasha T.K. , Rozhkova L.V., Kovalenko O.V. Innovatsiina diialnist v Ukraini u 2019 rotsi : naukovo-analitychna dopovid. K. : UkrINTEI, 2020. 45 s.
5. Orlova-Kurylova O.V. Geneza paradyhmy rozvytku innovatsiinoho pidpryiemnytstva v natsionalnii ekonomitsi. Intelekt XXI. 2019. № 1. S. 97–101.
6. Susidenko V.T., Susidenko Yu.V. Realii innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv Ukrainy. European scientific journal of Economic and Financial innovation. 2020. № 2(6). S. 183–193.
7. Taran S.V. Rehionalni osoblyvosti rozvytku innovatsiinoho pidpryiemnytstva : avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia kandydata ekonomichnykh nauk za spetsialnistiu 08.00.05 – Rozvytok produktyvnykh syl i rehionalna ekonomika. Lutsk : Lutskyi natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet, 2021. 20 s.
8. A holistic protection shields for start-ups: Prevent Liquidity bottlenecks, preserve future opportunities. COVID-19: PRESSURE POINTS: GERMAN START-UP LIQUIDITY PROGRAMME 2020. German Startups Association 2020. URL: https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/latest-thinking/covid-19-pressure-points-german-start-up-liquidity-programme-2020-germany
9. Ahmed M. Defining and measuring literacy: Facing the reality. International Review of Education. 2011. Vol. 57, No. ½. P. 163–184.
10. Baker T., Nelson R. E. Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2005. 50(3). P. 329–366 URL: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
11. Brown R. Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics. 2017. 49(3). P. 11–30. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7
12. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Centre (JHCRC). URL: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html .
13. Duchek S. Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research. 2020. Vol. 13. P. 215–246.
14. Kuckertz A., Brändle L., Gaudig A., Hinderer S., Reyes C.A.M., Prochotta A., Steinbrink K.M., Berger E.S.C. Startups in times of crisis – A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 2020. Vol. 13. P. 1–13. URL: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2352673420300251?token=7F58DB4C3B13C3BC8F70E63B23CF7CF392089E643C009E2F6856B9838DDAB00668ED91755DED97339951F72F1BA4E922&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20210917211258
15. Lefebvre V. Performance, working capital management, and the liability of smallness: A question of opportunity costs? URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1735252.
16. Linna P. Bricolage as a means of innovating in a resource scarce environment: a study of innovator-entrepreneurs at the BOP. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2013. Vol. 18. P. 1–23.
17. Morris M.H., Kuratko D.F., Audretsch D.B., Santos S. Overcoming the liability of poorness: disadvantage, fragility, and the poverty entrepreneur. Small Business Economics. 2020 Oct 3. P. 1–15. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00409-w .
18. Shantz A.S., Kistruck, G., Zietsma C. The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty. Journal of Business Venturing. 2018. 33(4). 416–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.02.003.